贝叶斯工作流
建模、诊断与后验预测
贝叶斯篇贝叶斯工作流程
- 数据探索和准备
- 全概率模型
- 先验预测检查,利用先验模拟响应变量
- 模型应用到模拟数据,看参数恢复情况
- 模型应用到真实数据
- 检查抽样效率和模型收敛情况
- 模型评估和后验预测检查
- 信息准则与交叉验证,以及模型选择
案例
我们用ames房屋价格,演示贝叶斯数据分析的工作流程
library(tidyverse)
library(tidybayes)
library(rstan)
rstan_options(auto_write = TRUE)
options(mc.cores = parallel::detectCores())
1) 数据探索和准备
rawdf <- readr::read_rds("./demo_data/ames_houseprice.rds")
rawdf
为了简化,我们只关注房屋价格(sale_price)与房屋占地面积(lot_area)和所在地理位置(neighborhood)的关系,这里需要点准备工作
- 房屋价格与房屋占地面积这两个变量对数化处理 (why ?)
- 地理位置变量转换因子类型 (why ?)
- 房屋价格与房屋占地面积这两个变量标准化处理 (why ?)
df <- rawdf %>%
select(sale_price, lot_area, neighborhood) %>%
drop_na() %>%
mutate(
across(c(sale_price, lot_area), log),
across(neighborhood, as.factor)
) %>%
mutate(
across(c(sale_price, lot_area), ~ (.x - mean(.x)) /sd(.x) ),
)
head(df)
df %>%
ggplot(aes(x = lot_area, y = sale_price)) +
geom_point(colour = "blue") +
geom_smooth(method = lm, se = FALSE, formula = "y ~ x")
df %>%
ggplot(aes(x = lot_area, y = sale_price)) +
geom_point(colour = "blue") +
geom_smooth(method = lm, se = FALSE, formula = "y ~ x", fullrange = TRUE) +
facet_wrap(vars(neighborhood))
2) 数据模型
$$ \begin{align} y_i &\sim \operatorname{Normal}(\mu_i, \sigma) \\ \mu_i &= \alpha_{j} + \beta * x_i \\ \alpha_j & \sim \operatorname{Normal}(0, 10)\\ \beta & \sim \operatorname{Normal}(0, 10) \\ \sigma &\sim \exp(1) \end{align} $$
如果建立了这样的数学模型,可以马上写出stan代码
stan_program <- "
data {
int<lower=1> n;
int<lower=1> n_neighbour;
int<lower=1> neighbour[n];
vector[n] lot;
vector[n] price;
real alpha_sd;
real beta_sd;
int<lower = 0, upper = 1> run_estimation;
}
parameters {
vector[n_neighbour] alpha;
real beta;
real<lower=0> sigma;
}
model {
vector[n] mu;
for (i in 1:n) {
mu[i] = alpha[neighbour[i]] + beta * lot[i];
}
alpha ~ normal(0, alpha_sd);
beta ~ normal(0, beta_sd);
sigma ~ exponential(1);
if(run_estimation == 1) {
target += normal_lpdf(price | mu, sigma);
}
}
generated quantities {
vector[n] log_lik;
vector[n] y_hat;
for (j in 1:n) {
log_lik[j] = normal_lpdf(price | alpha[neighbour[j]] + beta * lot[j], sigma);
y_hat[j] = normal_rng(alpha[neighbour[j]] + beta * lot[j], sigma);
}
}
"
3) 先验预测检查,利用先验模拟响应变量
有个问题,我们这个先验概率怎么来的呢?猜的,因为没有人知道它究竟是什么分布(如果您是这个领域的专家,就不是猜,而叫合理假设)。那到底合不合理,我们需要检验下。这里用到的技术是先验预测检验。怎么做?
- 首先,模拟先验概率分布
- 然后,通过先验和模型假定的线性关系,模拟相应的响应变量$y_i$(注意,不是真实的数据)
stan_data <- df %>%
tidybayes::compose_data(
n_neighbour = n_distinct(neighborhood),
neighbour = neighborhood,
price = sale_price,
lot = lot_area,
alpha_sd = 10,
beta_sd = 10,
run_estimation = 0
)
model_only_prior_sd_10 <- stan(model_code = stan_program, data = stan_data,
chains = 1, iter = 2100, warmup = 2000)
dt_wide <- model_only_prior_sd_10 %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(`alpha[5]`, beta) %>%
rowwise() %>%
mutate(
set = list(tibble(
x = seq(from = -3, to = 3, length.out = 200),
y = `alpha[5]` + beta * x
))
)
ggplot() +
map(
dt_wide$set,
~ geom_line(data = ., aes(x = x, y = y), alpha = 0.2)
)
stan_data <- df %>%
tidybayes::compose_data(
n_neighbour = n_distinct(neighborhood),
neighbour = neighborhood,
price = sale_price,
lot = lot_area,
alpha_sd = 1,
beta_sd = 1,
run_estimation = 0
)
model_only_prior_sd_1 <- stan(model_code = stan_program, data = stan_data,
chains = 1, iter = 2100, warmup = 2000)
dt_narrow <- model_only_prior_sd_1 %>%
as.data.frame() %>%
select(`alpha[5]`, beta) %>%
rowwise() %>%
mutate(
set = list(tibble(
x = seq(from = -3, to = 3, length.out = 200),
y = `alpha[5]` + beta * x
))
)
ggplot() +
map(
dt_narrow$set,
~ geom_line(data = ., aes(x = x, y = y), alpha = 0.2)
)
4) 模型应用到模拟数据,看参数恢复情况
df_random_draw <- model_only_prior_sd_1 %>%
tidybayes::gather_draws(alpha[i], beta, sigma, y_hat[i], n = 1)
true_parameters <- df_random_draw %>%
filter(.variable %in% c("alpha", "beta", "sigma")) %>%
mutate(parameters = if_else(is.na(i), .variable, str_c(.variable, "_", i)))
y_sim <- df_random_draw %>%
filter(.variable == "y_hat") %>%
pull(.value)
模拟的数据y_sim,导入模型作为响应变量,
stan_data <- df %>%
tidybayes::compose_data(
n_neighbour = n_distinct(neighborhood),
neighbour = neighborhood,
price = y_sim, ## 这里是模拟数据
lot = lot_area,
alpha_sd = 1,
beta_sd = 1,
run_estimation = 1
)
model_on_fake_dat <- stan(model_code = stan_program, data = stan_data)
看参数恢复的如何
model_on_fake_dat %>%
tidybayes::gather_draws(alpha[i], beta, sigma) %>%
ungroup() %>%
mutate(parameters = if_else(is.na(i), .variable, str_c(.variable, "_", i))) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = .value)) +
geom_density() +
geom_vline(
data = true_parameters,
aes(xintercept = .value),
color = "red"
) +
facet_wrap(vars(parameters), ncol = 5, scales = "free")
如果觉得上面的过程很麻烦,可以直接用bayesplot::mcmc_recover_hist()
posterior_alpha_beta <-
as.matrix(model_on_fake_dat, pars = c('alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'))
bayesplot::mcmc_recover_hist(posterior_alpha_beta, true = true_parameters$.value)
5) 模型应用到真实数据
应用到真实数据
stan_data <- df %>%
tidybayes::compose_data(
n_neighbour = n_distinct(neighborhood),
neighbour = neighborhood,
price = sale_price, ## 这里是真实数据
lot = lot_area,
alpha_sd = 1,
beta_sd = 1,
run_estimation = 1
)
model <- stan(model_code = stan_program, data = stan_data)
6) 检查抽样效率和模型收敛情况
- 检查traceplot
rstan::traceplot(model)
- 检查neff 和 Rhat
print(model,
pars = c("alpha", "beta", "sigma"),
probs = c(0.025, 0.50, 0.975),
digits_summary = 3
)
- 检查posterior sample
model %>%
tidybayes::gather_draws(alpha[i], beta, sigma) %>%
ungroup() %>%
mutate(parameters = if_else(is.na(i), .variable, str_c(.variable, "_", i))) %>%
ggplot(aes(x = .value, y = parameters)) +
ggdist::stat_halfeye()
事实上,bayesplot宏包很强大也很好用
bayesplot::mcmc_combo(
as.array(model),
combo = c("dens_overlay", "trace"),
pars = c('alpha[1]', 'beta', 'sigma')
)
7) 模型评估和后验预测检查
yrep <- extract(model)[["y_hat"]]
samples <- sample(nrow(yrep), 300)
bayesplot::ppc_dens_overlay(as.vector(df$sale_price), yrep[samples, ])
Conclusion
作业
- 前面的模型只有变化的截距(即不同的商圈有不同的截距)斜率是固定的,要求:增加一个变化的斜率
$$ \begin{align} y_i &\sim \operatorname{Normal}(\mu_i, \sigma) \\ \mu_i &= \alpha_{j} + \beta_{j} * x_i \\ \alpha_j & \sim \operatorname{Normal}(0, 1)\\ \beta_j & \sim \operatorname{Normal}(0, 1) \\ \sigma &\sim \exp(1) \end{align} $$
pacman::p_unload(pacman::p_loaded(), character.only = TRUE)